Yaxley - Aka 'Tommy Robinson' - At Centre Parcs - The Complete Summary


So. Seems quite a messy story, from a few days ago, regarding the arrest (again) of Stephen Yaxley Lennon for assault (again).

On the evening in question, I looked into the matter and dug around. So here's a full summary.


First, The News Story As It Appeared

"Tommy Robinson faces assault charge after Center Parcs arrest"

"Former EDL leader arrested at Woburn Forest site is due to appear in court in April.

The former English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson has been charged with common assault following an incident at Center Parcs in Bedfordshire. Police said the 37-year-old, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was due to appear at Luton magistrates court on 2 April and had been released on bail. He was arrested on Sunday at about 1.10pm after officers were called to Center Parcs in Woburn Forest over an altercation between two men. One man sustained an injury to his face and received first aid at the scene. A Center Parcs spokesman confirmed that police attended the Woburn Forest site on Sunday."

Then, of course, Yaxley-Lennon posted videos and statements declaring his innocence. He was, he claimed, 'defending his child from a paedophile'.

True to form, that alleged 'paedophile' quickly became - with no source whatsoever - an 'asian man' then a 'pakistani' and then a 'muslim'. "A muslim paedo attacking his own child" ? What a lucky break for Yaxley. Just what he always wanted.


So Here's The Actual Story


In the meantime I've spoken to Center Parks staff. To be honest, a fair few told me to 'piss off'. A number told me they 'couldn't talk about it' which is understandable.

But a couple of them gave me numbers of the staff on duty at the time. 3 hours and 27 phone calls later and Yaxley's ''version'' is well and truly busted. All it takes is a few phone calls. 

Robinson was drinking alcohol - some say, drunk - in his role as a parent supervising his kids at a swimming pool, a bystander commented on behaviour. Yaxley picked a fight, lost (or drew) and invented a little random story he knew his cultists would believe. Yaxley was arrested, the alleged 'paedophile' wasn't, because there was no case to investigate. Yaxley has since been charged (or is to be charged, we're not sure) and released on bail pending further enquiries.

*No* witnesses to any 'paedophile activity'.
*7* witnesses to the assault by Yaxley.

The whole thing is a hastily improvised setup job because TR got pissed and smacked someone - whilst out on license. Clearly the police weren’t buying it, and arrested him.


Just For Argument's Sake....


However there are those who think (I use the term loosely here) - based on absolutely nothing of value at all - that the story of the ''paedophile'' is true. To those, I address these simple, factual points.

So, just for argument sake, let's say, 'devil's advocate'-like, that there was some validity in the child's story.

  • The video released where Yaxley questions his child is not a statement from her, it is her saying 'yes' or  'no' to questions from her father. At one point she clarifies where 'the man' was standing. This is not sufficient evidence of any criminality, in the slightest.
  • The police have investigate the matter of the 'alleged' 'paedophilia' and have taken nio action against this alleged 'paedophile'. There are no witnesses.
  • The 'three hour delay' before police arrived has neither substance nor source other than a post from Yaxley.
  • Despite this, Yaxley has referred to the unnamed man as a paedophile (in his posts). Thus, in the very unlikely event that charges were to be brought against this man, it would be Contempt of Court and Prejudice of a Fair Trial, immediately.
  • Thus, Yaxley would be setting a 'sex offender' free.
  • As Yaxley claims (now) to know the law on such matters, having (he says) 'attended courses' it seems that he would actually be knowingly setting a 'sex offender' free. Intentionally.
  • Yaxley's fans are also circulating that the man was an Asian, in fact, a Muslim, in fact, a Pakistani. All invented. All without a single source.
  • Yaxley's crew have also publicised the man's name and address.

Yaxley's entire career as a Racist Grifter has been based on hatred and lies. Nobody believes a word he says.

Still, 'Just For Argument's Sake' - if there is some validity in the child's story, who does he have to blame for the disbelief ?  Himself. The ultimate Racist who cried MUSLIM PAEDO !


In Summary

He is a criminal fraudster who has gotten quite wealthy from his multiple scams. He has monetized the currency of hate. And he's done very nicely out of it, too.

If you believe his version, after his multiple convictions for violence and fraud - you're a gullible mug. And you, too, are enabling hatred and violence. Because you're probably paying towards it.


So, Why ?


So what's the real reason he came up with this story - or embellishment, whatever you wish to call it ?

Because he was in trouble with the police again ?

Or it's a great new excuse to run another crowdfunder ?

Or be's been out of the news for a while ?

Maybe he's upset that his new 'political group' launched this week fizzled out on day 1 with no publicity ?

What on earth would drive a man to use his child to save his own skin / career / bank balance ? To video her ''trauma'' and post it online?

At some point, Yaxley fans, you have to wake up and get real. 

He's nothing more than a little Fascist Street Thug. Know what he is.


41 comments

Anonymous said...

Bullshit there was an allegation that should have been followed up on both sides, both parties involved should have been arrested & the other persons phone should have been checked, the fact is 2 crimes have been reported & regardless to who the people are both crimes should have been arrested in an instant then there would have been proff if the story was made up or not but by letting the other person go this has given time to dispose of any evidence that could have been used against him if there was any of course

Anonymous said...

Please don't try to defend the little thug. You look rather silly mate.

macphisto said...

I take it you were there and witnessed it all did you, or are you just talking shit for the hell of it?? The only time people don't get arrested is when they haven't done anything wrong. Waxy Lemon is an out and out con man who relies on people like you to defend him to the hilt.

Anonymous said...

Oh dear, all a bit desperate

Anonymous said...

Ha ha ha ha, give it up. I bet you give him money, you gullible mug.

Anonymous said...

Hexs not a fit father, those kids would be bettered off without him.

Anonymous said...

Rancid hate monkey does even more rancid things than normal and gets caught out.

Oops

Anonymous said...

Defending his kid? Stop letting your nonce EDL mates near him then.

Grm.dunn said...

It's been 4 days since the offence and not one single person has come forward to back up his story but several have said that he was drunk and started a fight. Someone is telling porkies and my money is on the man that has form for fraud and libel.....

Anonymous said...

I saw the video of him being arrested, and he didn't appear drunk to me.

Anonymous said...

To go to Centre Parcs and ask all those people you clearly have a massive axe to grind and an obsession with defaming him. People will hear what they want to hear. I heard an innocent 8 yr old straight up saying she was assaulted. And I heard Tommy you're under arrest. There's no mention of your who your sources are? Tommy has cause not to disclose his...what's yours?

Anonymous said...

But to be fair he spends a lot of time videoing himself cooked but so how would you know

Anonymous said...

We all heard a child being coached. Sadly what you fail to recognise is guilt I terms of the alleged attack on the child is irrelevant as SYL has destroyed any chance of a successful prosecution. Given he claims to understand the law about that sort of thing, either he is lying and has manipulated his child or cares more about his own fame and image than his child

Unknown said...

Imagine what viws his child will grow up with.

Unknown said...

It was clear to any professional that this man coached his child. I would be extremely concerned about her care when in his supervision.
He was aggressive with the police and prolific swearing was in line with him being inebriated.
The family should be investigated by social services and an appropriate psychiatrist as concerns to the child's mental health, growth , development and we'll being are a priority. If negative responses from the professionals within the loall authority are forthcoming I would recommend a "no cintaco" order or "supervised contact" order between him and the child. With a ruling that in order to attend any contact a drug and alcohol test should be carried out each time of contact

HouseofMalakian said...

Did you read the article?! Asking those people IS WHAT THEY DID.

Anonymous said...

Prolific swearing is also consistent with being arrested for defending your family from a pedo. Facts can be interpreted multiple ways. They won't release the report into grooming gangs... Probably because if the massive embarrassment it will cause to the police for being so wilfully inactive, because it will reveal the political inaction and because it will confirm what waxy lemon was saying all along about the facial profile of the offenders. Pakistani Muslim man describes both an ethnicity and religion and therefore implies Culture as much of not nor than it does race. Smearing TR as a fascist racist is interesting since he is anti big government and he is against muslim belief system. Now he seems to be an agitator and grifter but then the criticisms should be at that is you want them to be accurate. Did your interviewing reveal who called the cops? Because you may find out it was TR who made the call (that's what he says and the police haven't contradicted him despite having ample opportunity)

Anonymous said...

What a pathetic load of dribble this article is.

Anonymous said...

Oh dear, drunk in charge of a minor.....What great parenting. I feel sorry for any progeny of his

Jennifer said...

I pity that poor child having him for a father.

Anonymous said...

what name did they give of the person he punched. I'd like to know that much at least

Anonymous said...

I don't like the man at all, but this account is no more reliable than his. Nothing to support your claim you spoke to anybody at CP. Nothing to support the account they give you if you did. Nothing except opinion and unfounded hearsay accounts to negate his version of events. A misrepresentation of him questioning his daughter (she said more than just yes and no) and as you clearly hate the guy, it's not impartial and so can't be relied upon.

What I find odd is:

Why didn't he, or anybody else present, get any footage or images of the suspect in the three hours he alleges it took for police to arrive? Or did he? Have I missed them? Seems like something Tommy and his crew would do...?

Unknown said...

You need Psychological Assessment whomever wrote all this slanderous , fabricated and very fake news !!!!!

Anonymous said...

mate I ain't being funny yeah.... I think any parent would be aggressive with the police if nothing is being done when there kid has just been touched!!!
Your all quick enough of calling him a racist street thug and it's all a scam blah blah fuckin blah but that's the only reason why your slating him the way your are because of his known reputation....
It also claims he is drunk and started a fight well for one he is on holiday with wife and kids why would he get drunk in front of them??? And also you can clearly see when with the police he isn't drunk he ain't slurring words and falling all over the place your just playing on that to the fact he is angry... Sorry but if some random man with no wife or kids only other men were in a kids swimming pool touch mhy kid up I'd have done more than give him a bloody nose he wouldhave been leaving via ambulance.....

Makes me laugh how your all so quick to judge him on his reputation.....

Also there is apparent witnesses to him being drunk and starting a fight which from what I can see are thw other men he was with quite clearly......

Also yeaah the fact that the police were called there for this sort of thing centre parcs would not be aloud by any circumstances to talk about this so where you got this info from that you got staff numbers etc to get the apparant dirt I'd love to know why because they would have been told by management to keep it to themselves

And the kid don't sound anything near being coached because as he is asking her things she's telling him no and then showing him on certain things...

I take it some of you which are putting the man down are in your 50s etc thinking you know everything about everything this is clearly from someone who clearly can't stand the man and is really trying to make him sound lower then scum by saying this is all fake......

And to the fact some of you are putting this man and child down and also others down because of what they think on the fact I take it you all have the perfect Lives yeaah!!!!

Anonymous said...

Where is he drunk......
Standing up fine
No slurring of words...

Ohhh his angry because his daughter got touched by some strange man so his drunk....

Mate I'd have done worse then give him a bloody nose!!!!

Anonymous said...

I pity your children if you have any that is having you as a mother....
Clearly showing that its fine to put someone down because of there reputation....
Noo leway for change Noo???

Anonymous said...

Astonishing that people are prepared to accept Robinson's version of events but dismiss this article as a load of lies!

1. ZERO witnesses to the alleged sexual assault.
2. SEVEN witnesses to him punching the other man.
3. Police DID investigate & found no evidence of the other man being a paedophile.
4. Robinson WAS drunk as confirmed by a number of people.
5. His wife wasn't there - Robinson was supervising his kids at a swimming pool. What sort of father gets pissed while doing that?
6. If this was true, it would be an incredible coincidence that this man, who claims we have a problem in this country with Muslim paedophiles, has his daughter sexually assaulted by a Muslim paedophile on an occasion when he has a mate there with means to film the incident.
7. His daughter was not distressed in the slightest. We don't even know that it was his daughter speaking!

Whatever your beliefs, there is nothing to back up Robinson's claims. Just imagine if you were the person accused. How would you feel about being called a paedophile?

Anonymous said...

Spot the gammon, frothing at the mouth in defence of his messiah "Tommeh", unable to use the correct version of your/you're or use punctuation and, from a video posted by Lennon, is able to deduce that he hasn't coached the kid beforehand!

Laughable, predictable gammonista behaviour! Jog on you numpty!

Anonymous said...

I have just read what is wrong with our country, the press, a pack of liars.

mivona said...

On having a child tell him she had been touched, his first response is to make a video, then assault the perpetrator, then phone the police?

Anonymous said...

Possible reactions to a crime:
a) remove child from danger
B) contact security re the danger
C) phone the police

or

1) attack the other person
2) traumatise a child by badgering them over an incident and put it on youtube
3) get arrested.


Which one would most reasonable parents do and which did poxy lemming do? he's a crook, a liar and an unfit parent.

Anonymous said...

Bless. Your sort love paedophiles don't you? You think it gives you license to assault people.

The best outcome here will be Yaxley-lemon going back to prison. Keep him away from those poor kids.

Anonymous said...

sounds to me like this is just a bunch of pedo's protecting a pedo, he clearly aint drunk and any normal person would do the same as he did if not worse in this situation

Anonymous said...

Let me get this right you think the police should arrest someone when ever an allegation is made against them, do you know how stupid an idea that is? I mean if they did that then everyone would be phoning them every time they were pissed off with someone.

So you would be happy to be arrested every time someone made an allegation against you whether there was evidence or not?? How silly how very very silly.

Anonymous said...

If the incident was reported without naming the 'orrible Tommy Robinson then you're left with an 8 year-old girl reporting a sexual approach by an adult male in a public swimming pool; following which her father has an altercation with the male and is subsequently arrested and the alleged offender freed. Surely this would raise public outrage right across social media with cries for increased security and vetting at such venues? There would surely be some sympathy for the girl?

Instead TR's name is mentioned - so the girl is clearly lying, he is obviously drunk, either the whole thing didn't happen or he set it up for his own publicity - and to top it off the kids should be taken into care to protect them from their father (let's not mention kids in care getting groomed).

Take a moment to ponder the FACT that the main stream media failed to make any reference to the sexual assault aspect of the incident. They purposefully omitted the core of the story to manipulate public opinion. How many times have they done the same to promote one side of any argument as they see fit? Plus, where does TR get the opportunity to counter those stories when he's been de-platformed - aren't there two sides to every argument?

Wake up people - don't play the hate game on their behalf.

Unknown said...

The bloke is a waste of tax payers money, i have to pay to keep that no good idiot at her majesty's pleasure. Can I get a tax return form please as I want to claim it back. Never liked the bloke, and the Centre Parcs bull he was putting words into his daughters mouth, lets hope she does not crow up to be a waste like her father

Anonymous said...

Go on youtube watch drunken dwarf fights holidaymaker in all cases the drunk will be screaming nonce or paedo...dumb drunks can only shout insults.

Time that unfit parent lost his kids

Anonymous said...

A parent taping while talking to their child no problem. Major problem is putting it on social media what parent does that to their child. A simple "I have recorded what my child said & will pass it to the police"
You don't put it on social media that's a crappy thing to do, as all her friends will now know. You can't justify that. He put his own sad pathetic ego before the welfare of the child.

Unknown said...

as far as the facts known he is the only one arrested and lets be honrst here if a serious sex pffence had committed the police no matter what a minoruty think would have srrested the guy who did not run but waited to see the police if wittbeses have said lennon was drunk and when told about drinking tomuch to supervise his kids lashed out and then using his kids to fabricate a excuse and the strong poss that he will e charged with making false statment with all the other charges that may be levelled he broke his parole conditions andas this guy nearly always films his arguments why not this time .if he has used his child to mske false claims makes him pretty sick if this comes out and he will have damaged her anyway the truth will out as sll the wittnesrs will give evedence

Anonymous said...

Bet you anything you like he has dropped his paedophile claim by the time he has to say it in front of a judge under oath. What a great Dad, spending so much of his life in prison.

Anonymous said...

Bullshit that why we have 100s of thousands of Muslim rape gangs raping and loading up British white girls with smack